Monday, June 28, 2004

A Birthday Resolution

I just saw Fahrenheit 9/11, but I'm not quite ready to post about it in any useful way yet. I will say that I intend to do something about it. It's been the cause of one of my lasting shames that I really don't like people very much; I'm not actually ashamed of that, because people, by and large, suck, but I am ashamed that this sort of feeling on my part prevents me from sticking to any effort to help out those in need of what help I can give.

I do know, however, that I am a powerful force for complaint. And perhaps it is in that vein that I might be able to help get George Bush where he belongs; not back to Crawford, as the earnest 20-somethings outside my work entreated me today, but in prison. Preferably after sitting before an international War Crimes tribunal, but I'd settle for a couple of decades for SEC fraud, too. I don't want him dead, for all you budding Secret Service agents out there; I know the law, I worked in the White House, and I was even supposed to be there; but not only do I think he's too stupid and callow to really have any part in what his Administration has wrought, but I don't believe that cold-blooded murder is any more justified when performed by the state.

I am willing to wait until his term has ended, and I don't want him in there alone; if anyone needs to languish in a tiny tiny prison cell, it's Dick Cheney. Powell can stay out, but he has to stop consorting with that sort of scum.

Saturday, June 26, 2004

Wanker Alert

As I was driving home last night, the traffic in front of me suddenly jogged to the left, into oncoming traffic, clearly to skirt some unknown obstacle. As the car in front of me cleared my lane, I saw two or three flares delineating a path around the obstacle.

I was quite surprised to see, stopped in front of the flares, a grey Ferrari Spyder (probably a 360 Modena, but I more conscious of cars potentially impactful than cars admittedly impressive), with its owner bending low over it. He had the hood ajar but not open (which stands to reason, since it's a mid-engine, so that's actually the trunk) but there were no police on the scene, and no evidence that there was anything drastically wrong with the car.

As I pulled past him, idly wondering if the man was Peter Angelos' son John (who he resembled) I noticed a bus lane to the right, less than two car-lengths further on.

I'd like to say that I gave the benefit of the doubt to this man that something was horribly wrong with his brand-new Ferrari, and he was reasonable in refusing to move it from half the travel lanes of a two-lane road. But it occurred to me that, since there was no police car present, he had those flares in his trunk, and he was goddamned well going to use them.

I know this because, when my tire exploded at 70 mph on the Beltway a month ago, the one bright spot was that I had an excuse to use my ridiculous Mercedes-stamped metal wheel chocks while changing the tire.

I'd also like to say that I wouldn't've jumped out immediately to get my flares in his situation, too, but I'm afraid I can't...

Wednesday, June 23, 2004

Victoriana

In the past few days it has been strongly implied, on more than one occasion, that I am possessed of a bit of a Victorian mindset. My initial response to these suggestions was flat denial, but I've since decided that the issue merits further consideration.

To my mind, 'Victorian' conveys a sense of prudishness and discomfort about subjects 'not suitable' for polite conversation, specifically those of a sexual nature. It also carries with it the notion that the person with the scarlet V on his chest has lived a sheltered and blinkered life, and knows little to nothing of such matters, hence the shame, and the embarrassed tittering (it also mutters about rigid codes of manner and dress, but that's not really what I'm interested in here). We're talking dust ruffles on piano legs, and Don't Ask Don't Tell policies.

As I write this, I cannot possibly imagine how anyone can believe this about me (to be fair, the word was not actually used; it more hung in the air like a sullen pinata). I was taken to task for my old-fashioned beliefs, however, and was all but accused of casting aspersions on those who don't share these creaky steam-powered beliefs of mine. These beliefs, as rendered unto me (although perhaps not quite in these words) are as follows:
  1. It is improper to have sexual congress before some arbitrary milestone in a relationship

  2. It is improper to carry on courtship with others whilst doing so with someone who was there first

  3. It is improper to behave in an improper manner in a relationship (this one may not be as well-conceived; basically, the third person agreed in vague terms with the first and second)
The first, as actually espoused by me, is that I do not assume that people who have recently begun seeing each other either definitely have or definitely have not had sex, in the absence of evidence one way or the other. I may have damaged my case slightly by referring to one participant as a 'ho', but I was also pretty clearly joking. For the record, I don't actually care if two people who've never met have sex in a beer-sodden field after she shows him her breasts in exchange for a handful of shiny plastic (this being the most debased form of casual sex I can muster on four hours' sleep). This does not mean that I'm interested in such activity myself, neither should it suggest that I have any respect for either participant; I just am not in any way shocked or horrified by it. To use a less extreme example, I am surprised neither by two people who have sex on the first date, nor by two people who don't have sex until months have elapsed since they met. I further believe that any relationship is changed by sex, although how much so depends a lot on the participants, and I think that to pretend otherwise does not make one cosmopolitan, but merely sets one up for nasty shocks.

The second, as actually espoused by me, is that at the onset of my relationships, I assume she and I are exclusively pursuing each other, unless otherwise stated. I don't have any problem with the idea that people, even most people, don't do this (although I honestly don't believe that most people are capable of playing the field, even should they want to). I don't judge anyone for doing so, I just don't do it myself, mostly because I can't be bothered. I've never been particularly interested in casual sex, except in theory, and if I am interested in someone enough to have sex with her, I'm likely to be annoyed and/or jealous if she sleeps with someone else, or even intends to. Not because that makes her a dirty dirty whore, mind you, just because I'm not interested in sharing anyone physically. If someone is not interested enough in me to be able to forgo others, I'd rather say goodbye and keep looking for someone that is. The converse is also true; if I find someone more interesting than the person I'm with, I don't see any reason to keep the first waiting around for me as I drift further away.

Again, to pretend that it's unimportant to you whether or not the other person has sex with others while doing so with you (in the subjunctive sense, not the active; that's a topic for another post, although the mere fact that it occurred to me and I brought it up should be enough to get this damned V off my chest) is counter-productive at best; either you really don't care, in which case, it can't be that exciting, or you really do care, in which case you're setting yourself up for some serious unpleasantness. It is a truism that most people are going to have a different attitude about sex than you do, so if you don't discuss these differences, you're either going to acquire a stalker when you were just looking for the aforementioned casual sex, or you're going to get hurt by someone who doesn't think that this magical experience indicates that the two of you are destined to be together. There's a reason, after all, why this conflict has been prevalent in narratives since the dawn of time.

It's worth noting that both of these mischaracterizations of my viewpoint occurred through the inherently faulty medium of IM, but the third was actually expressed by one who should know better, as I was recounting the first two. Essentially, it was put forth that I am in some sense prudish, although that sense was not carefully defined. I don't really know where to begin refuting this. I don't understand how believing that it's better to talk about what are essentially animal feelings makes me MORE of a prude than someone who is content to just let them unfold as they will. That, to me, is denial.

I'm trying very hard not to be bothered by this, but two of the people know me a lot better than to take these positions. Two of the conversations got fairly heated on both sides, I think, at least moreso than they really needed to. What's more, I don't believe I was allowed to state my position clearly in either of those cases. Not that I have done so here. Did I mention the four hours' sleep? 'Sleep' may be too strong a word...

Thursday, June 17, 2004

More perspective

Today after lunch, one of my coworkers was supposed to be showing a video of his arrival in the U.S. from Vietnam, so I went, planning on scarfing down my sandwich as I watched a home movie.

It turned out that, in 1979, 10,000 Vietnamese refugee boat people were dying each year as they tried to escape Communist South Vietnam. The BBC made a documentary about the captain of the Sea Sweep*, a man who plied the seas of Southeast Asia aiding refugees with food, repairs, and medical care. In the interest of preventing an international incident, the ship would typically reprovision a boat, repair any damage, provide any needed medical care, then set the boat people adrift again. This time was different.

So my new coworkers and I watched this documentary called "Desperate Voyage", not to be confused with the 1979 Steve McQueen film, and the three-year-old in the video would interrupt, saying "that's my grandmother!" or "that's me!"

Apparently a vessel of the Malaysian government came across a refugee vessel of about 250 people, and helpfully put them in 4 clapped-out boats and towed them out to the open ocean to die. As one of the SeaSweep's crew put it, they were in floating coffins.

The boat was repeatedly set upon by Thai pirates, its motor and stern ruined, what valuables the passengers had, stolen. By the time the Sea Sweep found them, they'd been adrift in the Pacific for 10 days with no food and 20 litres of water they'd captured during a rain storm. They were 93 people on what was essentially a 40-foot rowboat. The Sea Sweep pronounced their vessel unrepairable (in fact it sank while being towed back to Singapore) and took them aboard in a particularly wrenching scene as 93 people ate actual food for the first time in over a week.

My coworker cheerfully answered questions about his trials, then we all went back to our cubes and offices. I don't honestly know how anyone else got any work done for the rest of the day.

* Sea Sweep

Wednesday, June 16, 2004

In other news

David and I just saw Saved! and it was good.

Rob was there. He's much nicer than David.

Goblin was not there. She is also much nicer than David.*

Also, my left eye is very very itchy. I should probably stop rubbing it once it swells shut, huh?

* I should add that David has known me for over a decade longer than either Robgoblin, so perhaps there's a lesson there somewhere. It may be this: David is both old, and not very nice.

We're not worthy...

When I was about 11 or 12, before my life had taken on any meaningful complexity, I prided myself on my trustworthiness. I was a young man of my word. If I said I would do something, I did it, by gum, even when the person I'd promised had long since forgotten. No matter how inconsequential: if I said I'd call, I'd call. If I said I'd be there at 4, I was there a little early - never late. If I said I'd bring that book we were talking about, the next time I saw you, I'd do it, though that be weeks away. Everything was in order, and I was a model human being.

Shortly thereafter, I noticed that I had begun to miss these self-assignments every now and again. I'd forget to call because I was reading, or I'd forget to bring the book, because I was running late as I went out the door (I'm still rarely late; that's going to be last to go, thanks to a pathology acquired before I had my driver's license, and had to walk/bike/transit everywhere).

This concerned me immeasurably, of course, but the more it concerned me, the worse it got. I had my first real job as a sophomore in high school, and the added responsibilities and demands on my time meant that sometimes, even if I remembered, I still wasn't able to meet these trivial commitments, which were by no means trivial to me.

Over 15 years later, I forget everything. You may as well not count on me for a damned thing... You extracted a promise from me over the phone, while I seemed to be paying attention, when I was in fact concentrating on a bug. Or you told me about it, and while I had every intention of following through, something came up, or I remembered a prior commitment I'd forgotten. Or my personal favorite, you called me at 8:30 the morning after I'd been out all night drinking, and apparently my promise to meet you in front of the library had ANY WEIGHT AT ALL. Could you not HEAR the hangover in my voice?

Over the years, I've come to accept these lapses as regrettable but unavoidable, both in myself and to a lesser extent, in others. I've known people that promise the moon routinely, then promptly forget. I've known people that still somehow keep these charges; both types are often among the busiest people I know. I've learned that someone can make a promise with all of their heart, then break it, either because they've realized that it was foolish for some reason that didn't become clear until later, or because they had another engagement that they'd forgotten about, or because they simply forgot it in time that to keep it.
There are those who make promises with no intention of ever keeping them; I used to work for such a man, who banked his empty assurances on the knowledge that our company was far too disorganized for any consequences to accrue. These people are bastards. But the person who hasn't seen you in weeks, and then accidentally makes plans with you on their mother's birthday, the person that swears they'll bring that DVD over that you've made an elaborate little plan to watch that evening, the person that assures you that they'll never do it again, the person that didn't parse the tone of your request and decides that it wasn't crucial, these people are not bastards, at least not for that.

For the same reasons that no spouse can be all things to theirs, no one can align their lives with those of everyone around them, all the time. Things come up. Sure, you can learn from patterns in this behavior; if you always get the snub at the expense of Person B, or if they're always conveniently out when you call, or if they cancel and you run into them when you go anyway, yes, by all means, take offense, and modify your assessment of that person accordingly. But if they are genuinely sorry for the lapse, or if they make it up to you, or if they can reasonably be assumed to have just forgotten about it, it probably wasn't malicious, and you should probably just let it go.

Those of you who know me well are probably a bit surprised to hear me utter those words, even in print, but there is a huge difference between reconsidering past events to learn from them, and eternally letting them upset you. If you always let everything go, you're either Jesus or a human doormat*, but if you cling tight to every snub from everyone, you're really just going to wind up friendless, in the dark, with an ulcer.

* prove to me there's a difference, and I'll gladly give you 10%

Monday, June 14, 2004

Siiiiiigh

In other news, I'd somehow forgotten how pathologically averse I am to the tragedy that 1 in 2 Metro operators can't pronounce 'Judiciary' correctly. What the flaming holy hell does 'judiciuary' mean, anyway?

Perspective

Parts of my life have improved, parts of it still resoundingly suck, and not in the desirable New Vacuum Cleaner of the Future way. Meanwhile, I got a postcard the other day from one of my best friends, in which he chatted about his new position, and the weather, and the local sights, and the fact that he's in Mosul for the next year.

I... I think I just heard a gunshot down the street? Yes, that really is the best I can do. It's not even close. I wish him all the best and a safe return, and the sooner he moves to the private sector and starts having kids with his lovely wife, the better.

Saturday, June 12, 2004

Turnabout

Once upon a time, there was a young man who was having a great deal of difficulty healing after a breakup. There didn’t seem to be any reason it was so hard; it had been several years, and he could no longer reliably bring her face to mind. He didn’t even still hurt in any real sense, he was just pathologically wary of starting a new relationship without understanding how that one had be so brutally derailed.

He blamed himself for the dissolution; he could have been more thoughtful, he could’ve been more observant, he could’ve made more of an effort. On the other hand, he didn’t feel what he had done was so horribly wrong that he had to be so badly hurt as penance. His friends tried to help, but nothing they could say would bring her back, and nothing they could say would help him understand what had gone wrong. He became very bitter and cynical about relationships, and gave up what small efforts he was making to make new ones.

He went to a party at a friends’ house out of town. He was there well before the party started, and was already fairly well-lit by the time the other guests started to arrive. That’s when she showed up, making a dramatic entrance with a thick head of wavy red hair and a big infectious smile. She opened her mouth and a posh British accent poured forth, the medium for a steady stream of caustic witticisms that struck exactly the right chord with him. They hit it off immediately. The party moved to a dimly-lit club downtown, and to his horror, he found himself recounting the saga of the painful breakup, but she listened intently and seemed even more interested in him. He drank yet more, and there was a stumbling exchange on the dance floor in which he kissed her and got her phone number, promising to call as soon as he was home.

He did so, and she seemed surprised but delighted to hear from him. They began a phone and email exchange that consisted entirely of shared references and flirting, with virtually no real substance. He learned that she was in school to become a surgeon, and he told her about his disillusionment as an American pre-med. The flirting grew more intense, feeding off itself, each ever trying to one-up the other. They met in New York for a thoroughly surreal weekend in a borrowed apartment, sponsored by his credit cards. They went to excellent restaurants and ordered more sophisticated food than he'd ever had, food that made him feel like he must have ‘made it’ in some obscure way. She returned to school in London; the calls got shorter and more precious. The emails grew longer and bawdier, and suddenly they were discussing their engagement. She came to visit him at a break in school, and they went to the most expensive restaurant he’d ever been to in his life; their fellow diners were all CNN-famous, and he was more thoroughly entranced than ever.

He visited her in London a few times, on his own for most of the trips as she worked interminable rounds in one hospital or another. He wandered the city at random, walking miles every day, continuously marveling at the limitless array of things that were simply done better. The youngest historic sites were older than his entire country, and the city itself was approachable in a manner unlike any other place he’d ever been. He fell desperately in love with it then, and vowed to determine a way to make it his home. When he returned stateside, he began to read about jobs overseas, and to plan his escape. His conversations with his fiancée were about nothing else.

Eventually, and inevitably, they ran out of television programs to discuss, and conservatives to mock, and authors to share, and began to have petty squabbles. He wasn't fun enough for her, and she wasn't serious enough for him. As time passed, he visited her again in London, seeing even less of her this time. He discovered that his aimless style of exploring was less successful as he retraced the same steps with no guide and with no one to share what he'd discovered. He began to resent the expenditure for an interaction that amounted to little more than a series of phone conversations. When he returned home, he began having trouble reaching her at the accustomed time, and her excuses became less compelling as it became routine. Their squabbles worsened, and before long, the engagement was off. She returned his ring, and he began writing her letters in which he waxed lyrical about how important their love was. He wasn’t sure this was true any more, but it seemed like the correct posture, and he still very much wanted to move to London.

One night, at a terrifically lame party hosted by friends, there was the most fascinating woman he'd ever met, sitting by herself until he managed to convince her to come talk to him. They talked for hours, and he was completely at ease. She was opinionated but made no effort to censor herself, she mocked him readily but not cruelly when he was being an idiot. She was smart, she was funny, she was real. They began seeing one another in a very carefully controlled way; he explained the situation with his ex-fiancée as if it were salvageable, telling himself that this way, she could make her own choices about their relationship. She was with him once when the other called and he signaled her to be quiet as he answered the phone. She was, but he saw in her face how badly he had hurt her. He broke off his relationship with her several times, claiming it wasn’t fair to her, and confusing to him, but he couldn’t go more than a few hours without changing his mind.

He had bought a final ticket to London months earlier, before the engagement had been rescinded, and he decided to use it with no real intention, trying to convince himself that it was still worth the effort. He stayed in a cheap hotel far from the center of town, and saw her even less frequently than on previous visits; when he did it was wholly unpleasant. They agreed to go out to dinner to talk things over, and as they did, he got angry, and his voice became louder, and increasingly less appropriate. She asked him to keep it down; it was a regular haunt of hers. At that moment, her priorities crystallized before him. He stormed out, leaving the ring in her coat pocket. He made his way back to the hotel, stopping at the Tube station to call America.

She answered the phone and was reserved as he told her of the night’s events. She asked him what it all meant for them, and he told her that he was hers if she wanted him. She broke down in relief but quickly recovered; they talked a little longer before they hung up, and he went back to his hotel more sure he’d made the right decision than he’d ever been in his life. He spent the last few days of the trip in Wales, wishing she were there.

Over the years, he often reflected on that phone call, on the mixed emotions in her voice, on the palpable effort she was making not to reveal her turmoil before he shared his decision. He knew he had been horribly cruel to claim there was a chance with his ex-fiancée, but he continued to tell himself that it had been for her own good, refusing to see how severely it had hurt. He failed to grasp the conflict between her anger and her happiness, between her relief that it had gone the way she wanted and her feeling that it should never have been in doubt. Then one day, a little over seven years later, he understood everything as he hung up the phone, everything all at once.

Tuesday, June 08, 2004

Sliding Doors

What import the decisions we make? For every choice we're proud of, there are those of which we are horribly embarrassed, those which impact our lives hardly at all, those which we earnestly hope are never discovered by another person, ever, and those which we'd make again without even thinking.

There's obviously a continuum in play for any given decision, no matter how consequential or trivial; we can change the course of our lives in seconds by deciding to get on a plane, by deciding not to take a job offer, by deciding to try and write a book, by deciding not to pursue someone we're interested in, by deciding not to cross the street against the light, by deciding to pick up a particular magazine. There's no way to be sure, for a specific decision, how important it is to us, how our possible paths might alter our perspectives, or our very lives.

So how to make any choices at all? How not to be utterly paralyzed by the thought that, if we order a muffin instead of a danish, we'll have no leverage to converse with the sweet young thing in line behind us, who placed the exact same order? How to know when to set something you love free, how to know when to fight for it until your last breath? How to know when a blah job will put you in a position to meet your ideal business partner, how to know when it will merely sap your will to live for years to come?

There's a concept in investing called 'dollar cost averaging', which is briefly defined as 'buying low to offset the times you bought high, and selling high to offset the times you sold low'... it's a great concept in theory, as it minimizes risk to the point where, if you truly applied it in an orthodox fashion, you would exactly break even. But what's the point of that? You can break even simply by never investing, never assuming any risk, never reaping any unexpected profits. Obviously, what you want to do is to employ dollar cost averaging as a default position, to minimize your exposure to risk, but simultaneously to try to avail yourself of any extraordinary opportunities that present.

Applying this to real life, if you make your decisions from a reasonably consistent set of principles, the crap choices you make should tend to mitigate the clever ones, and vice versa; this doesn't mean, however, that you shouldn't take the odd chance now and again, especially when the payoff is eminently worth it.

If you meet someone, and that person is exactly the sort of person you're looking for, but they're not entirely available, you have two choices: attempt to show them that you're the one they want to be with, or stand aside and see what happens. Either choice might be the correct one; if you take the first option, and they resent you for it, you've destroyed something that might have eventually happened anyway. If you take the second, and they were secretly hoping you'd take the first, you've disappointed them, and will probably never even know it.

Pascal's wager teaches that, since it is eternally in your favor to believe in God and be wrong, as opposed to not believing and being wrong, that it's best to hedge your position and spend a lot of time kneeling on Sunday... I've never really bought this argument, because I think it ignores the monumental unlikeliness that there is any justification whatsoever for the existence of a gratuitous Supreme Being, but the essential logic is hard to argue with; if you are presented with two possible outcomes, and one is vastly more desirable than the other, you need to think about the possible consequences of adopting one or the other outcomes as a goal; in the example from the preceding paragraph, the situation is as follows:
  1. You pursue the person, and you win them

  2. You pursue the person, and you drive them away

  3. You don't pursue them, but you would've gotten them had you done so

  4. You don't pursue them, and you wouldn't've won them, even had you done so
If the prize is worthy enough, there is nothing on this earth that should stay you from the first, except the price of hidden option 5, which is that you pursue them, but it turns out that you would have ended up with them only had you NOT done so. Therein lies the rub; how can you ever be SURE that something is worth the risk? Is it better to focus on the value of the favored outcome, and ignore the repercussions of failure? Perhaps, if you're talking about a person you've just met, but less so if that person is your best friend's ex...

My personal position is that it is always better to risk it, no matter how much you fuck your life up (assuming you don't get yourself killed). Yes, you might regret your rashness, yes, everyone that knows about the situation will be in a position to judge your decision as foolish, but so what? What if you'd been right? What if, because you made the wrong choice once, you decided to play it safe from then on, and missed a much more important opportunity? To return to the investment analogy again, this is like deciding never to buy a promising stock again, because you were burned when you bought a stock that turned out to be over-hyped. Sure, you can show a minor profit investing in nothing but Treasury Notes, but you'll never get rich. Why allow your past stupid decisions to haunt your future choices? Inform them, sure, but prevent you from taking a risk? I'd rather be dead.

Rampant Slurping

Now that I've got your attention... this will not be the sort of epic that I haven't written enough of, nor been read by sufficient people, to be known for, but it is also NOT A COMMENT:
  1. There is something sublime about a large cocktail glass that has nothing in it but the juice of a particularly fine lime and far too much of the gin that lives in my freezer.

  2. I finally (like, 4 days after ordering it; I'm impatient, sad but true) received my new Vacuum Of The Future, which is, sadly, the best thing that's likely to happen to me for months (I have already forgotten the new job, yes). 'Tis a Dyson Animal, 'tis, and in a few short passes over the rug in the kitchen, I nearly clogged its mighty cyclonic chamber with at least 75 tons of cat hair... I am the reluctant custodian of four cats, mind you, and it's possible that I haven't vacuumed in quite some time, but there's no way there should be this much cat hair in my house. Clearly, there is abiogenesis in our midst... regardless, I now feel immensely less embarassed about how excited I was to get this silly thing. Also, to forestall the inevitable comment, yes David, it would beat the hell out of your new Shark with its hose tied behind its back, so there.

Sunday, June 06, 2004

Imminent Signs of Your Own Death, Part I

So there's this thing on the back of my leg; technically I suppose it's a bruise, but that sounds a little wimpy to get worked up about, so I'm going to assume it's some sort of life-threatening thrombosis that has caused a hematoma, or thrombotoma, if you will... if you won't, get your own blog, because here at JWERBlog, we're talking about my ominous thrombotoma.

It's one of those things, you know, when you suddenly realize that some obscure body part, like a toe, or the back of your arm, or let's face it, pretty much anything below the knees for me (I don't get down there that often), is in excruciating pain. Pain that makes you sit up and take notice of the fact that there's more to your body than you are usually aware of, i.e., your arms and your head. It's possible that normal people are aware of more of their bodies than that, but I figure what's the point? All my lower legs ever do is smash into things and bleed and then ache for weeks, so it's probably better to ignore them.

This particular pain, however, was interrupting my sleep, so I thought I'd better temporarily suspend my laissez-faire health policy. However, when I tried to examine the source of the pain, there was nothing. All systems normal, except for the hurting like fuck. I had performed one of the two methods of checking to see if you've trod in dog feces, Option A, Looking Back Over Your Shoulder And Raising Your Foot to Inspect the Tread of Your Shoe (even if there's nothing there, that's because you transferred it into some expensive carpet somewhere, probably in your own house. Not in my house, though; all my carpets are cheap as hell. But I digress. Once again: my blog. Get used to it). So I went back to sleep, and it was still there in the morning, greeting me like a particularly unwelcome dog, that wakes you by standing on your genitals, and weighs 95 pounds. So, to recap: not good.

At this time I decided to perform Option B, Looking Down Your Chest While Raising Your Foot. And there, nestled just below my knee, at the top of my calf, was one of the more alarming bruises thrombotomas that I have ever discovered in a strange location on my body. The last time this happened, the source of alarm was right about where I incorrectly assumed my liver was vacationing, and was the size of my palm; I discovered this in the mirror one morning, and while alarmed, decided to ignore it until it went away, as it eventually did. This was also my plan for the evil that lurked on my leg.

You might be saying to yourself at this point, "I can't imagine finding a huge bruise on my body and not remembering where it came from," but that is because you are a bastard, and don't drink to excess nearly as much as you should. All your friends talk about you behind your back, and damn right too. At any rate, I crash into things all the time, from all sorts of inappropriate angles, regardless of my level of sobriety. I'm a little tallish, but mostly, I'm just not very bright. And unless there is actual evidence of blood (and not just a spot; there's really no point in worrying about that), I will do my utmost to keep moving. It is the rare painful impact that actually prevents me from keeping moving, and yes, I DO remember those. So in your face.

Ahem. The reason this affliction is alarming is not that it's particularly large, but that it presents a strange demeanor; there's the main bruise, that just looks like someone stabbed me in the calf with a broompole, but then there's this dark, almost black line, about three inches long, shortly below it. I know from other foolish injuries that this is usually the evidence of a substantial quantity of pooled blood, but ignoring what I said above, it really seems like I would remember an impact that caused that much internal bleeding. What's more, when I employed Option B, the pain had started to subside somewhat from the night before, so I was well on my way to ignoring it. But then it started to hurt again, so I looked at it again, and my brain (which I may have mentioned, is trying to kill me) convinced me that it Looked Worse (this also happened with the ominous vacationing liver thromobotoma, but that one went away before I started noting imaginary symptoms of liver failure, so it may have been a false alarm).

So it's pretty obvious what's happening here: all the stress in my entire life concentrated itself in the back of my left leg, where it sat, and waited, and waited, until I had managed to alleviate some of the sources of said stress. Then it took out a tiny hacksaw, and went to town on some complicit blood vessel, which happily gouted blood subcutaneously until there was enough pressure to hurt. My trusty injury repair personnel went to work immediately, so things improved to the point where I could ignore it, but they missed the stress, with the hacksaw, and also, I drink way too much coffee. Therefore it clearly follows that I'm going to die, and will be found pallid on a blood-soaked mattress, my young life tragically having sploobed out a hole in my leg. That's right, sploobed. Why would you question a dead man?

Alternatively, I can ignore it, until it goes away.

Saturday, June 05, 2004

Entrails... unkinking... slightly...

So Thursday wasn't too bad, and Friday was an even further exploration of not too bad... I've started to remember important things about working in DC, simple small things that add up to a greater whole of not-wanting-to-commit-multiple-homicides-daily:


  • always make the coffee at home, to spare yourself the ridiculous prices for crappy coffee at the train station

  • after making the coffee, put it in a thermos rather than a travel mug; you probably don't need it that badly anyway, and you don't need to worry about tipping the mug over

  • shoot for a train that has another train shortly thereafter; that way, if you miss the first, you won't be late to work (this is esp. helpful when two trains get to DC within 10 minutes of each other)

  • earlier trains = more quiet zombie types to share the ride

  • later trains = more perky loud people talking about their relationship with Christ

  • No one knows the proper protocol for getting off a train, no matter how obvious it is, so stop expecting them to

  • ALWAYS STAY TO THE LEFT on the escalators if you expect to move forward at any sort of speed (this rule also applies to the BW Parkway)

  • get a decent portable music-purveying system as soon as possible; this will become more important on the ride home...

  • on the ride home, DO NOT sit near the train bathrooms

  • on the ride home, DO NOT sit near the blocks of four communal seats; this is partly because of the legroom issue, but mostly because of the annoying fucking asshole issue

  • when you get thoroughly absorbed in your book, know, in some small part of your brain, that some annoying fucking asshole (see above) is going to make a horrendous noise and jar you back to reality in an unpleasant way

  • try not to kill her; try harder

  • what the hell do people see in gin rummy anyway?

  • but I digress...

  • given that it's rained at least three days out of the last seven, maybe you ought to take an umbrella to work, huh?


By keeping in mind these simple axioms, I predict that I will be a happy, well-adjusted commuter minnow within a month, unless I get my iPod sooner...

Wednesday, June 02, 2004

Something amiss in the entrails

So, altogether, not the most auspicious beginning to the latest chapter in my career as a programming drone...

I hadn't done my research, so I was taken aback by the perhaps predictable 30% increase in the price of a monthly MARC ticket since last I bought one (perhaps more predictable since, several months ago, it had become cheaper for me to commute to my old job in a car that got less than 15 mpg than to take Light Rail, after they raised the fares by, um, 30%).

The MARC train that I used to hate taking, because it was so often delayed by the Amtrak train that shared its track, was, indeed, delayed by the Amtrak that shares its track.

The ride down was uneventful, although since I was in the quiet car, I was berated for peeling a price sticker off my book too loudly (OK, perhaps 'berated' is too strong a word, oh hi).

The Metro segment was smooth enough, although I got out at the wrong exit from Metro Center, and wandered aimlessly until I recognized the nondescript building that is my new home away from this shitpile. No omens of import. Move along, citizen.

I spent the morning familiarizing myself with my new environs, which was fine, if somewhat disappointing, since I am to dwell in a cube once more (albeit a nicer cube with a better PC, and, oh yeah, no asshole boss) then there was a meeting, which was heartening mostly in that it introduced me to the happy fact that my new coworkers are a total bunch of slackers; I felt more at home immediately. After the meeting, there was a sort of group eating-of-food-procured-outside (one of the most immense improvements since my last job, which offered within walking distance 1 gas station deli and 1 worst-Wendy's-on-the-planet; now I am offered every restaurant in the known universe, all within a 1-block radius), and everyone discussed random topics until we started talking about current events, when it was revealed that the bulk of my coworkers are also fairly usefully liberal (if some perhaps a little too Christian for my heathen tastes).

Then, after lunch, and another meeting, more slackitude in evidence, I made the fatal mistake of trying to actually accomplish something... I know, a rookie mistake... it seemed to go well at first; I didn't visibly fall asleep as I was walked through the systems I'd be supporting, which might be a first for me, and then I went to go look at the actual code, and realized that, in fact, the development environment hadn't been installed on my machine. That took about two hours (thank you Microsoft), and then when I tried to open the application, I got an obscure error that I had no idea how to correct, or even how to begin to correct. I tried a couple of things in the vague hope that I wouldn't have to reveal to my new supervisor that I had lied dramatically about my skillset, and yet...

Fortunately, after I finally succumbed, and called him over, he couldn't figure it out either, even after performing the same two procedures 900 times in ever-quicker succession. Unfortunately, there was no easy way for me to bail without seeming less-than-committed, so I hung around muttering helpful suggestions until about 6, at which point I excused myself as earnestly as possible, and took a relatively simple ride back to Union Station, where the GODDAMNED TRAIN WAS LATE AGAIN.

I swear, I don't understand how Amtrak employees can make eye contact; at least MARC employees can get away with blaming everything on the awesome craptacularity that is Amtrak, but the Amtrak people have NO excuse. "I know, let's spend countless millions on aluminum veneer for our stupid timetable boards so that we can distract our customers from the endlessly-delayed trains displayed on them." Maybe, and this might be the ice cream I had for dinner talking, maybe they could spend some money on ACTUALLY IMPROVING SERVICE.

You think I digress, but the reason my train was late? Delayed by the Amtrak train sharing its track! That's right. So I got home at 8pm, a mere 13 hours after I left... Which, considering how little I am called upon to do and how ridiculously well-compensated I'm going to be for doing it, is not really that big a deal. I should just be happy I have a job, there are starving people in China, I complained that I had no shoes until I met a man that had no feet, etc.

I'm still claiming 9 hours for today on my time card.